Prospective evaluation of prognostic impact of KIT mutations on acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11

Y Ishikawa, N Kawashima, Y Atsuta, I Sugiura… - Blood …, 2020 - ashpublications.org
Y Ishikawa, N Kawashima, Y Atsuta, I Sugiura, M Sawa, N Dobashi, H Yokoyama, N Doki…
Blood advances, 2020ashpublications.org
The prognostic impact of KIT mutation on core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-
AML) remains controversial. We registered 199 newly diagnosed de novo CBF-AML
patients, aged 16 to 64 years, who achieved complete remission. They received 3 courses of
high-dose cytarabine therapy and no further treatment until hematological relapse.
Mutations in exons 8, 10-11, and 17 of the KIT gene were analyzed. Furthermore, we
analyzed mutations in 56 genes that are frequently identified in myeloid malignancies and …
Abstract
The prognostic impact of KIT mutation on core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) remains controversial. We registered 199 newly diagnosed de novo CBF-AML patients, aged 16 to 64 years, who achieved complete remission. They received 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine therapy and no further treatment until hematological relapse. Mutations in exons 8, 10-11, and 17 of the KIT gene were analyzed. Furthermore, we analyzed mutations in 56 genes that are frequently identified in myeloid malignancies and evaluated minimal residual disease (MRD). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS) according to KIT mutations. The RFS in KIT-mutated patients was inferior to that in unmutated patients (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-3.00; P = .003). Based on subgroup analysis, KIT mutations had a prognostic impact in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, but not in those with CBFB-MYH11, and only exon 17 mutation had a significant prognostic impact. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with stepwise selection revealed that the KIT exon 17 mutation and the presence of extramedullary tumors in patients with RUNX1-RUNX1T1, and loss of chromosome X or Y and NRAS mutation in patients with CBFB-MYH11 were poor prognostic factors for RFS. MRD was evaluated in 112 patients, and it was associated with a poorer RFS in the patients with CBFB-MYH11, but not in those with RUNX1-RUNX1T1. These results suggested that it is necessary to separately evaluate AML with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 according to appropriate prognostic factors. This study was registered at www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ as #UMIN000003434.
ashpublications.org